CTBT: panacea for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

CTBT: panacea for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

Broad Consensus for the CTBT

The Preparatory Committee for the 2010 Review Conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) ended its third session on 15 May 2009 after two weeks of debate at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, United States. While the meeting could not reach consensus on recommendations for the 2010 NPT Review Conference, the broad consensus in support of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) was evident.


The CTBT's entry into force was called for by over 30 countries or groups in the general debate alone (see highlight on 6 May 2009). Twenty of the 32 working papers introduced to the meeting contained substantive positive language on the Treaty. These included papers by the European Union and the 'Vienna Group of Ten', which focussed exclusively on the Treaty, as well as by Australia, Canada, Iran, Japan, the United States and New Zealand or groups such as the New Agenda Coalition, the Group of Non-Aligned States, and the State Parties of Treaty of Tlatelolco.

 

P5 Statement supportive of the CTBT
For the first time in nearly a decade, the P5 (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States) issued a joint press statement on non-proliferation supportive of the CTBT. Also, the head of the Preparatory Commission for the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization (CTBTO) was welcomed by all NPT Parties to officially address the Conference.

To strengthen the NPT regime, it is essential
that the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
enters into force without further delay.U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

The broad support reflects the number of Member States to the CTBT. 180 States have signed the Treaty, of which 148 have already ratified. While most other international treaties enter into force when the number of ratifications reaches a certain quorum, the CTBT has a special entry into force clause stipulating that all 44 specific countries listed in the Treaty's Annex 2 must have ratified. These States participated in the CTBT's negotiations in 1996 and possessed nuclear power or research reactors at the time. Thirty-five of these States have ratified the Treaty, including the three nuclear weapon States France, Russian Federation and the United Kingdom. Of the nine remaining States, China, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Israel and the United States have signed the Treaty, whereas the DPRK, India and Pakistan have not yet signed it.

It bridges the divide between the different emphases placed
on each of these pillars by the NPT’s different parties. It signals
commitment to disarmament. It strengthens non-proliferation.
It facilitates peaceful uses.CTBTO Executive Secretary Tibor Toth

New Book on the CTBT presented

On the margins of the NPT PrepCom, the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR) hosted a panel discussion on 13 May 2009 in which the recently published book, Unfinished Business: The Negotiation of the CTBT and the End of Nuclear Testing by Dr. Rebecca Johnson, was presented. Johnson is co-founder of the U.K.-based Acronym Institute, and a long-time CTBT supporter.


Other panelists included Mr. Sha Zukang, U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Economic and Social Affairs, who expressed his personal view that China should ratify the CTBT. Ms. Patricia Lewis, deputy director of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, spoke about the Treaty's situation after ratification by the U.S. and China and addressed the question of its provisional entry into force. Former U.S. Ambassador Stephen Ledogar spoke of how best to address the challenge of U.S. ratification.

Dr. Johnson’s book provides a detailed history of the CTBT through an array of historical accounts and comprehensive summaries.  Its publication comes at a time when the CTBT is gaining significant political momentum. It reminds us that the movement to create the CTBT was not limited to the efforts of a politico-scientific fringe group but was an enormous undertaking by a diverse multitude of people throughout the world — a mainstream movement to remove the threats posed by nuclear testing. 


At a time when U.S. ratification of the CTBT is highly topical, Dr. Johnson’s description of how the actions of both Democratic and Republican U.S. presidents paved the way for the creation of the CTBT clearly demonstrates that this is not an issue restricted to a single political party or ideology. Her book also draws important lessons from the CTBT's negotiations that can be applied to future arms control treaties.